Does A Poor Essay Example Allows Me To Work My Writing Skills?

Does A Poor Essay Example Allows Me To Work My Writing Skills?A few questions I've been asked about the poor essay example feature in Scantron: The Official Scantron Guide is:Why is a poor essay example necessary? There are many writers out there who are forced to write essays all the time. While some of these writers might be good writers with very decent writing skills, many others are new to writing and their skills are challenged by the academic environment.Why should a writer give a poor essay examples? Many writers are unsure of how to properly construct a well-crafted essay and they don't have many examples to rely on.What types of essays can I use poor essay examples from? One thing I've learned is that poor essay examples are only for situations when a writer doesn't know how to successfully craft a solid essay. For example, if you're a new writer, you might not know how to construct a good essay.Another situation where poor essay examples are appropriate are situations wher e a writer has taken too long to start on their paper. The entire point of Scantron is to save you from making mistakes and you shouldn't have to suffer through a paper that's ruined because of the mistakes you made along the way. So the first scenario is when you've just started writing an essay.Thirdly, the last scenario where a poor essay example is appropriate is when you have gone a bit overboard and have taken longer than you expected to get your essay finished. As you can imagine, this scenario doesn't really apply to a 'mainstream' writing style. In these scenarios the poor essay examples are more like a trial run examples for the reader to see what the scantron program can do.Are there any other circumstances where a poor essay sample is appropriate?Yes, there are. But in most cases the situation is pretty rare and very specific, so you're better off taking a risk and being prepared than having to make an educated guess.One last note: If you have any doubt as to whether or not you should use a poor essay sample, then skip it and go right into the real work. You'll be much more likely to figure out the real problem and correct it in a timely manner.

How Does Mary Shelley Persuade the Reader to Pity Frankenstein’s Creature free essay sample

At the time, the Industrial Revolution was occurring and science was being developed. Scientists carried out experiments with electricity, trying to bring frogs back to life. Shelley visited an alchemist’s castle in the Rock of Franks where she was inspired by the alchemy. Two of Shelley’s daughters had died which influenced her to make the novel about life and death. She would relate to Frankenstein in the novel as members of both their families die young when it is not their fault. She was brought up with writers as her parents wrote about politics and society and her husband Percy Shelley and friend Lord Byron were both romantic poets. The main themes of the novel are creation, rejection, jealousy, power and misuse of it, revenge and responsibility. A film of the novel, directed by Kenneth Branagh, was released in 1994. Chinese Box Narrative is used to structure the story. The structure helps you feel sympathy for the creature as you hear three points of view – Walton the explorer, Frankenstein and the creature. We will write a custom essay sample on How Does Mary Shelley Persuade the Reader to Pity Frankenstein’s Creature? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page As the creature’s point of view is last, you feel sympathy for him because you first hear Frankenstein’s point of view and feel negatively towards the creature, however when you hear the creature’s point of view after that, you think that Frankenstein is exaggerating and you feel sorry for the creature and what Frankenstein has done to it. Victor Frankenstein is a scientist who is fascinated by creation. He decides to use his knowledge of science to create a human being. However, when his creation comes to life, Frankenstein is horrified by it and becomes ill. Meanwhile, the creature escapes into the woods. When Frankenstein returns home, he discovers that his brother, William, has been murdered. His adopted sister Justine is wrongly convicted of the murder and executed. The creature meets up with Frankenstein and demands that he makes him a female creature so he is no longer lonely. However, Frankenstein can’t forgive the creature for the deaths of William and Justine so half way through creating the female creature he destroys it. The creature takes revenge by killing Frankenstein’s wife Elizabeth and his best friend Henry Clerval. Frankenstein goes travelling to try and hunt the creature down. He comes across a ship in the Arctic where he tells the captain his story. However, on the ship he becomes ill and dies. The creature finds Frankenstein dead and travels towards the Pole to destroy himself. Victor Frankenstein was interested in science from a young age. When he goes to study at the University of Ingolstadt, he developed a further interest in chemistry and became obsessed with the idea of creating life artificially. â€Å"Life and death appeared to me ideal bounds, which I should first break through, and pour a torrent of light into our dark world. This shows that Frankenstein wanted to be able to control life and death by breaking through the bounds of it and â€Å"†¦pour a torrent of light into our dark world† could mean he wants to do something good for the world connected to life and death, for example, being able to stop death or being able to bring someone back to life. â€Å"The world was to me a secret which I desired to divine. Curiosity, earnes t research to learn the hidden laws of nature, gladness akin to rapture, as they were unfolded to me, are among the earliest sensations I can remember. This shows that Frankenstein wanted to find out about the world and its secrets. He also wanted to find out about the hidden laws of nature which could be how life is created. He develops a fondness for his adopted sister Elizabeth. â€Å"No word, no expression could body forth the kind of relation in which she stood to me – more than my sister, since till death she was to be mine only. † This shows Frankenstein has strong feelings towards Elizabeth because he sees her as more than a sister and he wants her to only be his. Frankenstein’s two lecturers at the University of Ingolstadt both have different view on him. M. Krempe disagrees with Frankenstein’s views on science and tells him to restart his studies. Have you really spent your time in studying such nonsense? M. Krempe thinks that the idea of artificial creation of life is nonsense and that alchemy is non-existent. However M. Waldman is more understanding of Frankenstein’s views and his lectures revive Frankenstein’s interest in life and creation. â€Å"In M. Waldman I found a true friend. His gentleness was never tinged by dogmatism; and his instructions were given with an air of frankness and good nature that banished every idea of pedantry. In a thousand ways he smoothed for me the path of knowledge, and made the most abstruse inquiries clear and facile to my apprehension. † This shows that M. Waldman has helped Frankenstein a lot with his studies and has made the concepts of science easy to understand. Both professors’ views on science and creation could reflect the views of the general public at the time. As science is just being developed at the time, half of the public would have the same view as M. Krempe in that it is all nonsense, and the other half would have the same view as M. Waldman, understanding of it and interested in it. One of Frankenstein’s weaknesses was his temper. â€Å"My temper was sometimes violent, and my passions vehement; but by some law in my temperature they were turned, not towards childish pursuits, but an eager desire to learn, and not to learn all things indiscriminately. This shows that Frankenstein wanted to learn and often had a temper when he couldn’t. That could explain one of the reasons he had a temper after the creature was made; he couldn’t learn where he went wrong with making it. Another one of his weaknesses was that he judges by appearance, especially when he rejects the creature. â€Å"†¦I had selected his features as beautiful. Beautiful! Great God! His yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of a pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that almost seemed of the same colour as the dun white sockets in which they were set, his shrivelled complexion and straight black lips. This shows that Frankenstein already thinks of the creature as horrid even when he hasn’t done anything. This means that Frankenstein is only judging on appearance. Because of his appearance, he rejects the monster and that could be what caused the monster to start killing. Some of the things that the creature does in the novel makes you agree with Frankenstein’s view of the creature. Even though Frankenstein just judges the creature on its appearance, he spent a long time planning and making it. Winter, spring and summer passed away during my labours† Also, he was often so engrossed in creating the creature that he ended up a wreck and he only kept working because of his determination to see the finished creature. â€Å"Sometimes, I grew alarmed at the wreck I perceived that I had become; the energy of my purpose alone sustained me: my labours would soon end, and I believed that exercise and amusement would then drive away incipient disease; and I promised myself both of these when my creation should be complete. You can understand why Frankenstein was disappointed with the finished creature after he spent all that time and effort making it and it turned out to be the opposite of what he wanted. You would sympathise with him and think that he would just want to forget about it all. When the creature kills William, he gives his locket to Justine so she gets blamed and no one suspects him. â€Å" †¦the murder I have committed because I am forever robbed of all that she shall give me, she shall atone. The crime has its source in her; be hers the punishment! The creature puts the blame on an innocent person even though he acknowledges that he is the murderer. You feel further sympathy for Frankenstein and his family when Justine is forced to confess to the murder and is executed. The creature bullies Frankenstein into making him a female companion. â€Å"†¦if I cannot inspire love, I will cause fear; I will work at your destruction. † This makes the creature seem manipulative, controlling and evil. It also makes you feel sympathy for Frankenstein as he is being forced to do something he doesn’t want and something that could have a lot of consequences if it goes wrong. The creature drives Frankenstein to his death after Elizabeth and Clerval are both killed. â€Å"†¦I devote myself, either in my life or death, to his destruction. † This shows that Frankenstein has just about given up on life after the deaths of all his friends and family, and only cares about destroying the creature, not if he lives or dies. However, other parts of the novel make you sympathise with the creature. He is abandoned by Frankenstein after he is created. â€Å"It was dark when I awoke; I felt cold also, and half frightened, as it were instinctively, finding myself so desolate. The creature is frightened because he is lonely and doesn’t know what to do because no one had spoken to him since he had been created. In Branagh’s film interpretation, the creature is compared to a baby: He is created in amniotic fluid and can’t walk properly. That makes you have even more sympathy for the creature because it is like Frankenstein is abandoning a baby. The creature isn’t accepted by anyone just because of his looks. â€Å"†¦I had hardly placed my foot within the door, before the children shrieked, and one of the women fainted. The whole village was roused; some fled, some attacked me, until, grievously bruised by stones and many other missile weapons, I escaped to the open country†¦Ã¢â‚¬  You feel sympathy for the creature because he can’t go anywhere where there are people without being attacked as the people assume that he is a bad person based on his looks. As no one accepts him, the creature is always lonely. The creature is seen to be kind, especially at the cottage. â€Å"This trait of kindness moved me sensibly. I had been accustomed, during the night, to steal a part of their store for my own consumption; but when I found that in doing this I inflicted pain on the cottagers, I abstained, and satisfied myself with berries, nuts and roots, which I gathered from a neighbouring wood. † This shows that the creature thinks of other people before himself and is willing to give up what he wants for other people. This happens before the creature is provoked in any way or feels the need to kill, so this could be his real personality. While at the cottage, the creature looks up to the people living there and would like to look like them. I had admired the perfect forms of my cottagers – their grace, beauty, and delicate complexions: but how was I terrified when I viewed myself in a transparent pool! † You feel sympathy for the creature as he wants to look normal and it is not his fault he looks like he does. Even though he helps the people who live in the cottage, they still think o f him as a hideous monster when they first see him. â€Å"At that instant the cottage door was opened, and Felix, Safie, and Agatha entered. Who can describe their horror and consternation on beholding me? Agatha fainted; and Safie, unable to attend to her friend, rushed out of the cottage. Felix darted forward, and with a supernatural force tore me from his father, to whose knees I clung: in a transport of fury, he dashed me to the ground, and struck me violently with a stick. † You feel sympathy for the creature because he has done a lot of hard work and sacrificed a lot of things for the family, but they still think of him like everyone else does. He also gets the same reaction when he saves a girl from drowning. â€Å"She continued her course along the precipitous sides of the river, when suddenly her foot slipt, and she fell into the rapid stream. I rushed from my hiding place; and, with extreme labour from the force of the current, saved her, and dragged her to shore. She was senseless; and I endeavoured, by every means in my power, to restore animation, when I was suddenly interrupted by the approach of a rustic, who was probably the person from whom she had playfully fled. On seeing me, he darted towards me, and tearing the girl from my arms, hastened towards the deeper parts of the wood. I followed speedily, I hardly knew why; nut when the man saw me draw near, he aimed a gun, which he carried, at my body, and fired. You feel sympathy for the creature because the man doesn’t want to associate the saving of the girl with the creature and whatever the creature does, he will not be accepted by anyone. Before the creature is insulted by William, he sees him as a friend. â€Å"If, therefore, I could seize him, and educate him as my companion and friend, I should not be so desolate in this peopled earth. † The crea ture was never planning on killing William, and originally wanted to try and make friends with him so he would have a companion, because otherwise he would still be lonely. However, William thinks the same as everyone else of the creature. â€Å"’Let me go,’ he cried; ‘monster! ugly wretch! you wish to eat me, and tear me to pieces – You are an ogre†¦Ã¢â‚¬  The creature would be fed up of being insulted all of the time and possibly think that violence isn’t bad as violence is used against him all of the time for no reason; this time there is a reason to use violence. When the creature asks Frankenstein for a companion, he says he only wants one so he isn’t lonely anymore. â€Å"It is true, we shall be monsters, cut off from all the world; but on that account we shall be more attached to one another. Our lives will not be happy, but they will be harmless, and free from the misery I now feel. † The creature doesn’t want to interfere with other peoples’ lives, it just wants to live with someone and be happy. When Frankenstein at first declines the request, you feel sympathy for the monster because everyone else has the right to a partner they can live with, but the creature doesn’t because of his looks and Frankenstein won’t give him one. The creature is misunderstood by Frankenstein when he is creating his companion. When the creature sees the creation, his look is one of pleasure and love. Frankenstein, however, interprets these as evil. â€Å"As I looked on him, his countenance expressed the utmost extent of malice and treachery. I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged. The wretch saw me destroy the creature on whose future existence he depended for happiness, and, with a howl of devilish despair and revenge, withdrew. We feel sympathy for the creature because we know that he doesn’t want the companion for evil and he has to see it (the only hope that he has) being torn to pieces before his eyes. When Elizabeth is murdered, you have no sympathy for Frankenstein because the creature wants Frankenstein to know that he has suffered, and the only way of doing that is for his to suffer the same way: Frankenstein destroyed the creature’s companion so the creature kil led Frankenstein’s. If Frankenstein hadn’t destroyed the creature’s companion, Elizabeth would not have been killed. In Branagh’s interpretation of the novel, Elizabeth’s death and the creation of the female monster were swapped over. That made you feel more sympathy for the creature because instead of making the female for the creature, Frankenstein made it for himself as it contained Elizabeth’s head and Frankenstein was just trying to bring Elizabeth back to life. It makes you feel like the creature has been cheated and that Frankenstein is just being selfish and not fulfilling the creature’s request. When Frankenstein dies at the end of the novel, the creature feels genuine remorse. Oh, Frankenstein! generous and self-devoted being! What does it avail that I now ask thee to pardon me? I, who irretrievably destroyed thee by destroying all thou lovedst. Alas! he is cold, he cannot answer me. † Even though Frankenstein has inflicted a lot of pain on the creature, the creature still feels remorse for his death. This makes the creature seem more human and you can sy mpathise with him more. In Branagh’s interpretation, Walton is like the audience – he feels negatively towards the creature in the beginning but accepts him at the end. Walton is won over when the creature says his first two lines to him. â€Å"He didn’t give me a name. He was my father. † Those two lines would make you feel sympathy for the creature because as Frankenstein never gave him a name and is just referred to ‘The Creature’, it dehumanises him even though he has many human characteristics. â€Å"He was my father† makes you feel further sympathy as the creature’s ‘father’ has just died. In the novel, the creature likens himself to Satan from Milton’s Paradise Lost. â€Å"Many times I onsidered Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition; for often, like him, when I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me. † He is similar to Satan because he is rejected by his creator (God/Frankenstein) and gets revenge on them. They both only act like monsters because their creators think they are monsters. Frankenstein could be compared to God as he creates the creature and thinks of him as a monster, but he could also be compared to Satan because they both want to play God and take over creation. In conclusion, I think that throughout the novel, our sympathy switches from Frankenstein to the creature numerous times, but by the end we feel sympathy for everyone but Frankenstein, especially the creature. The creature never considers that killing is wrong, because violence had been used against him so many times in the past when he had done nothing wrong, so he would have thought that there was nothing wrong with killing when someone had done something wrong. You could put the blame on Frankenstein for that as he never teaches the creature that violence is wrong.